Smaller discs to cover the unit circle

By William Entriken

1 minutes

Here is a paper I wrote a while back in 2003 and wanted to publish to a math magazine:

Smaller discs to cover the unit circle

MathWorld cites the best known solutions for n=9 as 0.422 and n=10 as 0.398. My solution is better with n=9 as 0.414 and n=10 as 0.381.

Just when I finished, I looked around for more references and related work, after MathWorld and all those sources. Well, it turns out that two other people:

both had published the same solution I came up with. Really, who would spend the time to solve such an esoteric problem? Nerds!

Comments

There are no comments yet.

Please discuss this topic anywhere and let me know any great comments or media coverage I should link here.